The value of data, if distributed fairly, is an incentive for transparency.
Useful knowledge is costly to compile and too often brings little benefit to the people who hold it. Let those people control its use and share in its value, and careful documentation becomes worth doing. Better decisions and greater transparency can follow from the same incentive.
The knowledge exists. The decisions that depend on it are made without it.
Local knowledge sits in people’s experience, paper files and disconnected systems. The organisations making decisions about those places often cannot find it, compare it or establish what it supports.
A buyer repeats an assessment. A programme cannot establish its baseline. A researcher has to reconstruct who did what, where. The gap is not simply missing data: it is the missing connection between the people who know and the people who need to decide.
Where nothing can be verified, honest and dishonest trade at the same price.
Specific needs no longer require starting from scratch.
Digital systems that do not fit the work.
Information that is scarce and hard to get.
Local knowledge that could support better decisions.
DAAC focuses on places where information is hard to obtain and existing systems do not meet local needs. Geography is a consequence of those conditions, not the definition of the market.
Reusable frameworks and workflows make it possible to build for a specific operation without paying for every common part again. The system can fit the people using it and still connect to systems elsewhere.
A better account of what is there can change the judgement made from a place’s reputation alone.
Local civil society participation
Crowdsourced KYC
Frontier-market investment
Banking the unbanked
In-country research
Community interventions
Artisanal mining
Small-scale farming
Targeted market research
Off-grid and mini-grid energy
Conservation projects
Indigenous and community land & forest management
Refugee and displaced-population economies
Grassroots disaster preparedness
Smallholder fisheries & aquaculture
Pastoralist livestock economies
Community-based tourism
Different decisions need evidence from the same ground.
A buyer needs to understand its supply. A financier needs to assess an operation. A programme needs to measure a change. Their questions differ, but the evidence often concerns the same people, places and activities.
Today those questions trigger separate visits, forms and reports. Information collected for one purpose rarely reaches the next person who could use it. Connecting the evidence lets each decision build on work already done.
An AI assistant needs that connection too. A useful answer must be traceable to the sources it relies on, with uncertainty visible and access governed by the holder.
The opportunity is to make local evidence useful to everyone authorised to use it.
A shared reference lets a question follow the same subject across different sources. This illustration shows that discovery process: recognise the subject, find what each source holds, and bring the evidence into view. Access to the underlying information remains a separate decision.
Value realised, not extracted.
A holder decides how their information can be discovered, accessed and reused. DAAC brokers the connection with those who need it, without taking custody. The holder can realise value from the knowledge they have compiled.
- Discovery for a record that never had a public address
- Permissioning that always resolves to the holder’s own terms
- Nothing changes hands until the holder allows it
Spine, Frame, Forge, Scribe and Crawl carry the weight underneath, so the exchange above can be trusted rather than improvised: discovery, conformance, exchange and the public record, built once and shared by everyone who builds on them.
- A shared protocol across participating systems
- Conformance that makes an origin record comparable anywhere it travels
- Public evidence connected to the people, places and activities it describes
As more people can reuse the evidence, careful documentation becomes useful beyond the first transaction. The shared reference grows while each holder retains their own record.
The reference database for the unindexed world, owned by the people who build it.
The ambition is a connected reference for places and activities that are poorly understood, compiled by the people who know them. Their knowledge becomes easier to find and use while ownership stays with them.
The people closest to an operation have a view that an occasional visit cannot replace. Useful digital tools give that knowledge a form others can recognise.
Hubs add public context. Connected systems make relevant information discoverable. Agreed terms let the holder choose when that knowledge serves another decision.
Bring the question closer to the people who know.
Tell us what you need to understand, who holds part of the answer and what stands in the way. That is where the work starts.